Best Places To Live
Call us gluttons for punishment (and angry letters from you), but this year, we dared to tackle the unthinkable—we’ve numerically ranked (virtually) every place there is to live in our county, from best to worst. Yes, this means there is indeed a Number 1—and it also means there is a Number 40. Read on, and see where your town fell in our rankings.
(page 1 of 9)
Photography by Phil Mansfield
With Adam Samson
Makeup by Jill K. Imbrogno for JKFlashy Makeup Service Co.
![]() |
|
Photo by Phil Mansfield |
Maybe we all ask ourselves these questions at some point: “Did we make the right decision moving here?” “Are the schools better elsewhere?” “Did we pay too much for our house?”
I ask myself why I moved to New Rochelle every time I drive along one of the city’s crowded streets, with the traffic lights so poorly timed that it seems they’re always red, and I can’t move a block without having to stop. Must be that everyone else in the city feels the same way, because they’re all honking their horns. It’s like a massive case of road rage. But then, just as I’ve decided to pack up and move someplace better—and saner—I catch a glimpse of New Rochelle’s shoreline, and I head for it, down to the marina, where everyone is happy and friendly and smiling, and the city seems to have an entirely different personality.
That’s what this article is about: weighing the plusses and minuses of a community. Of course, we all have different criteria for what makes one town great and another town just okay. Good schools may be super-important to a young family, but to a retired couple, less so. A lively downtown may be what a single twentysomething is looking for, but fortysomething marrieds with children may not care at all about how many clubs their downtown has. Nevertheless, how does one go about evaluating a town? How can we determine the best places to live?
"Best" is, of course, subjective. And while a town may look good on paper—good schools, a breezy commute, plentiful parks—that certainly doesn’t guarantee that everyone living there loves it. Nevertheless, there is some merit in trying to determine the livability of an area, and, fortunately for us, there is a load of information available that helped us do so.
We found reams and reams of statistics to pull from. Our county government, in particular its Databook and its Land Use Report, offers information on just about everything in our 450-square-mile piece of earth that 950,000 of us call home. We also used the online site bestplaces.net to procure other data—e.g., how much houses cost and how much homeowners pay in taxes annually for their homes. To determine the quality of a school, we used the most recent SAT scores available (which we obtained from the New York State Department of Education). And yes, we know that SAT scores do not tell the entire story of a public school’s quality—indeed, we have in previous articles pointed out that there is a high correlation between the wealth of a community and its children’s SAT scores—but SATs are still one of the most frequently used criteria for judging a school’s success, and the scores are, of course, one of the factors colleges use to admit or reject students.
In all, we looked at 11 categories to determine the quality of a town: its public schools (high schools, specifically); housing costs; property taxes; proximity to New York City (as measured in commute time, in minutes, from the center of each town to Times Square as calculated by Google Maps); safety (per the violent crime index from bestplaces.net); diversity (as measured by the odds that two random people from the same town will be of different ethnicities); parks and recreation (average acreage of open/green space per residential unit); proximity to water (distance from the center of each town to the Hudson River or the Long Island Sound, whichever is closer); a lively downtown; shopping; and nightlife.
While most of the categories are measurable, the last three—a lively downtown (cafés, restaurants, pedestrian activity, general atmosphere, cultural offerings); nightlife (quantity and quality of bars, clubs, evening dining, and evening activities); and shopping (the quality and quantity of, and accessibility to, retail establishments)—are all subjective, of course. We used our knowledge of the county, as well as that of our trusted writers and sources.
Obviously, every one of our categories is not equally important. Many of us would be willing to do without a few music clubs for safe streets; diversity may be important to some of us but not to others. So we weighted the categories. How did we come up with our formula? We asked visitors to our website to tell us which of the 11 categories are most important to them. We also asked our friends, families, and anyone who would talk to us. And then we hashed it out in our offices (“I don’t care how close I am to the river,” one editor declared. Argued another, “It’s one of the first things I considered when I looked for my new apartment.”) And this is what we worked out, in terms of importance:
Schools |
25.3% |
Housing Costs |
15.4% |
Property Taxes |
12.1% |
Proximity to NYC |
9.9% |
Safety |
7.7% |
Diversity |
6.6% |
Lively Downtown |
5.5% |
Shopping |
5.5% |
Parks and Recreation |
4.4% |
Nightlife |
4.4% |
Proximity to Water |
3.3% |
(total equals 100.1% due to rounding)

Email
Print






I must be missing something. Why does the racial mix of a town weigh into what makes it a better or worse place to live? What happened to judging people on the content of their character rather than the color of their skin?
PS When did "Hispanic" become a race rather than a national origin??
Fantastic to finally see Ossining get the credit it deserves. it is a great community, with so much diversity that is appreciated and even cherished, wonderful parks and waterfront, great boating, fantastic schools, a huge assortment of restaurants, a fantastic library and a great community indoor pool facility.
Don't agree with #2. If this town was affordable we would have looked at homes in this area. Taxes in some parts were $19K!
Bigger homes on smaller lots do not a community make. But in Westchester, so many areas are all about individual homes that are meant to impress and not co-exist well within the town they are located. Things to do, natural beauty, conservation, preservation, and a sense of belonging, i.e., a true "community" in the old sense of the word - that what makes a town great.
I found these rankings to be completely skewed. Schools and safety should have been weighted much much heavier. Restaurants, shopping, and dining are hardly as important as you made them out to be since the beauty of Westchester is being able to conveniently explore different towns for those things. Also, the biggest glaring flaw was when you touted towns with low housing costs and property taxes, since in most cases that also signifies lesser schools, and therefore a less desirable place to live. Very disappointing and inaccurate article.
Ossining #2,is this a joke!. There is no night life, there is no shopping other than supermarkets, there isn't even a movie theater or bowling alley for kids to go to. All there is one or two good pizza places, a nice libarary, and an old prison. In terms of property taxes $12K/yr is affordable! In terms of crime, there many drunks, a lot of which are illegals, that roam aroung town late at night with plenty of fights. I had my car borken into twice in my own driveway which is not far from the high school! In some areas most of the home owners do not even live there but rent them to undocumented immigrants. I am looking foward to moving out of that town and out of Westchester.
You have to be kidding with these rankings? Harrison and North Salem are just horrible places to live...Yonkers is so much more civil.
The mania for lists and rankings always ends up trivializing important distinctions between the people, places, events etc. that are being evaluated. That said, I'm pleased to see Ossining at #2. In many ways, it is a community that is a model of how diverse people can live together with respect and shared purpose. What better lesson to give young people? The library, which is certainly the jewel of Ossining, strives to be inclusive, and it has to be one of the most welcoming--and beneficial--institutions as such around. Great recreation programs, schools ready to serve all kinds of learners, affordable homes--plus a farmer's market and an international dance studio! This is a vibrant, New Millenium community, not without its blemishes, but offering a better way of living for the sum of its inhabitants.
Ossining can be great. Not there yet. I moved here for the low taxes. No longer true. Ossining quietly and callously hiked taxes 50% to 70% in the past 5 to 7 years. Also, no nightlife at all, almost no restaraunt's and a nice waterfront project killed. Don't get me started about the schools.
I was shocked and disgusted by this article. In the key provided, "diversity" only factored in at 6.8% of what determined a town's overall ranking. Why then is "diversity" listed so prominently in the second and third columns of the ranking chart? Are those columns actually a heads-up to perspective buyers? Were you afraid to lose this valuable data in the fold?
What does "odds that two random people from the same town will be of different ethnicities" indicate? Is it that your children will be fortunate enough to be exposed to different cultures, or is it chances that an African American or Hispanic person might move in next door? This wasn't explained in the article, either. I haven't been able to find the source of this data.
Finally, how did the author come up with a 1 - 10 ranking for diversity in these towns? What methodology was used to determine this number? Is a lower value "better" or "worse"? Does the "4" for Irvington mean 4 minorities live here? In that case, I am 1 of the 4 minorities sending children to its school district.
I hope the next time Westchester Magazine decides to factor diversity into a "Best Places to Live" article it will consider factoring "percent of racists" into the equation.