Advertisement
Westchester's Pop Culture
Sep 23, 2008
03:56 PM
Poptional Reading

The Verdict on Judge Jeanine Pirro

©2008 Warner Bros Ent. Inc. All rights reserved.

Judge Jeanine Pirro approaches the bench.

When Bedford resident Glenn Close accepted her award during the (mostly lame) Emmy Awards on Sunday, she noted that television is finally starting to realize that strong women can anchor great shows. I couldn't help but think of Judge Jeanine Pirro, whose new daytime court show debuted on Monday. We know how she operated as Westchester D.A., but how does she work on the D.V.R?

Before watching Judge Jeanine Pirro, I wondered how she would shape her small-screen persona. Would she be a forceful spitfire like Judge Judy, or a more benevolent figure like Judge Koch?

Actually, I was quite impressed at the way she split the difference between the two: assertive and no-nonsense, sure, but without seeming as, well, crazy as Judge Judy. She did the job a television judge is supposed to do: cry foul on the nonsense that some of the people try to pass by her, sometimes with a cry of "Baloney!" or "Hogwash!" To one witness, she asked, "Do you have children?" When the witness answered in the negative, she replied with a curt "Good."

At times, of course, her Westchester D.A. roots were showing. In two of the three cases she heard on her premiere episode, she moved beyond the small-claims judgment and pushed for prosecution. In the first case—two cousins who moved in together, got into a dispute, and were suing each other for lost property, damages, and rent—it came out that both the plaintiff and the defendant were victims of rape by the same man. "I was a D.A. for thirty years," she told the girls. "I ran an office in a major metropolitan area,"—hey, that's us!—"I dealt with rape and child abuse as my areas of expertise." After sorting out the bit with the rent and damages, a title card informed the audience that Judge Jeanine Pirro was pushing to reopen the girls' rape investigation and prosecute the perp. In the last case, a 14-year-old boy terrorized his next-door neighbor, splashing bleach on her, breaking the window of her apartment, and trashing her car. The neighbor sued for the money to have her clothes, window, and car fixed, but Pirro didn't think that went far enough. She pushed the plaintiff to file criminal charges and, when the teen started making threats, called the Chicago P.D. then and there. "We're not going to have victims be afraid of criminals because they are seeking justice!" Jeanine snapped. It seems you can take the judge out of the D.A.'s office, but you can't get the D.A. out of the judge.

Even without catching references to her Westchester D.A. experience, you can definitely recognize the TV Jeanine Pirro as the big personality we remember. A bright-pink shirt pops from beneath her judge's robe. You couldn't see the heels, but you knew they were there. Her set, like her house in Harrison, was a bit much: there was a black-and-white swirl of tiling on the floor that formed a geometric flower shape, marble walls (no word if she hand-picked the marble herself), a wooden bench and, behind her, an official seal that was illuminated with bright blue lighting. One defendant, who kept a ring after an engagement was broken, claimed she kept it because it was a birthday present (silver, with the September birthstone on it) and not an engagement ring. Jeanine took one look at the ring and, without the aid of a jeweler's loop, said, "This is not silver, this is white gold. Those are sapphires. And that's a diamond. And this is an engagement ring." And then she put it on her finger. Yep, that's the Jeanine Pirro we remember.

Then again, if I were home sick instead of here in the office, I'd probably be watching it now.

Reader Comments:
Old to new | New to old
Sep 24, 2008 11:41 am
 Posted by  Anonymous

How could anyone trust her judgment?

Oct 3, 2008 02:44 pm
 Posted by  spottieottiedopealicious

how could anyone not trust her judgment?

sass = good

i wish more judges had sass

Oct 3, 2008 03:02 pm
 Posted by  Marisa LaScala, Associate Editor

When I plead my case before a judge, I'm not looking for anything interesting, just clear-headed, boring thorough knowledge of the law.

In the world of television trials, though, give me a ranting, raving personality willing to accuse the accusers and yell insults and plaintiffs and defendants alike. It may not be justice, but it sure is fun.

Oct 15, 2008 08:31 pm
 Posted by  Anonymous

Sexist.
She is a judge not a psychic.
She needs to cut out the guess work.
She needs to stop talking about how she knows better because she was a d.a.
She was not there when the issue came about, she needs to shut up and hear everyone out. She is the star, she doesn't need to hog the camera.

Oct 31, 2008 04:24 pm
 Posted by  Anonymous

Every episode I have seen where there is a woman versus a man, she becomes extremely sexist. You can watch and see how she's always accusing the man of being the wrongful one no matter what the man says. I believe she's sexist, and extremely dislike the way she takes her time out of her show to tell the woman to never let a man touch, hurt, abuse them when there was no proof that the man even touched her. I believe she is sexist. To her, the man is always the wrongful one. In this day, the way our country is now, a woman will make up things and try to bring themselves up just as equal as a man. I don't believe a man should hit a woman and I think it's completely wrong to do but in the episode I just watched there was no proof. It seems as if she assumed just because the man was black and of course, a guy, he MUST be messing around with another woman, a drug dealer, past convictions ... everything not needed for the judging.

Dec 3, 2008 04:36 pm
 Posted by  Peacefulway

How can I get in contact with Judge Pirro for an interview? I'm a law/psychology student at UMUC and I would love to interview her for my Psychology of Intimate Relationship class on her views regarding her work in the area of domestic violence.


Peacefulway

Add your comment:

Create an instant account, or please log in if you have an account.




Forgot your password?
Verification Question. (This is so we know you are a human and not a spam robot.)

What is 1 + 4 ? 

About This Blog

Marisa LaScala

Marisa LaScala
Elmsford, NY

Articles Editor Marisa LaScala joined Westchester Magazine in 2003, and ever since she's blown every paycheck at the Greenburgh Multiplex. She also staunchly defends Richard Kelly, doesn't mind spoiling the endings of trashy movies you're curious about but don't want to pay to see, wishes the Hold Steady would come and rock out Westchester, misses Arrested Development more than anyone can imagine, and still watches cartoons and Saturday Night Live. You can find more of her cultural criticism at www.popmatters.com, where she is a staff writer.

Recent Posts

Archives

Feed

Atom Feed Subscribe to the Poptional Reading Feed ยป

Advertisement